Single sex spaces are a question of consent

Single spaces are intended for the use of one sex or the other.
They are often provided to protect everybody’s privacy.

It’s a question of dignity

Being forced to undress, wash, share sleeping accommodation or have personal care with a person of the opposite sex without your consent is degrading.

No one shall be subject to degrading treatment.

Everyone has the right to respect for their private and family life

Article 3 and Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights

Shared single sex spaces are often the most practical way to provide lots of people with everyday privacy and dignity.

It’s a question of consent

In the UK the Equality Act 2010 sets out many everyday situations where it is lawful to provide single sex services. This includes:

Circumstances where a person of one sex might reasonably object to the presence of a person of the opposite sex

Equality Act 2010 – Schedule 3, Paragraph 27 (6)

People using a single sex service have not consented to sharing with members of the opposite sex.

Single sex spaces should be simple

The law does not require that any particular type of service is always provided on a single sex basis.
Mixed sex facilities can be fine too.


You shouldn’t need a law degree, or a PhD in gender studies to work out who can use which facilities. Nor should you have to guess.

To protect everybody’s privacy and dignity there needs to be clarity.

Why has this become so difficult?

The rules and expectations about single sex services have become confused.

Some people think they are based on ‘gender identity’

Some think they are based on ‘gender expression’
(clothing and appearance)

Some think there are no rules at all

There is no right to share intimate spaces with members of the opposite sex without their consent

Where a service is provided for a single sex, whether for everyday privacy or a situation such as a rape crisis centre or a women’s refuge, there should be no need to negotiate with each individual member of the opposite sex about why it is not open to them.

Shared single sex spaces need clear and unambiguous rules

Single sex spaces do not suit everyone:
Some people do not feel comfortable with their sex.

Alternative options, either mixed sex, or not shared with others are often possible: this protects everyone’s privacy and inclusion.

TAKE ACTION!

Liz Truss, the Minister for Women and Equalities has recently said that protecting single sex spaces will be a key part of the government’s approach on the Gender Recognition Act, with details to be announced in the summer

Write to the Minister

Write to Liz Truss to say you support the protection of clear and unambiguous single sex spaces

Email or
House of Commons
London SW1A OAA

Write to your MP

Write to your MP to
Explain this is an issue of consent and ask them to write to the minister

Tell your friends

I’ve written to the Minister for Women and Equalities – single sex spaces are #aquestionofconsent

Losing sight of the law

Last year independent researchers, Kath Murray, Lucy Hunter Blackburn and Lisa McKenzie wrote a paper on policy capture:  Losing sight of women’s rights, published in Scotland’s leading journal on current affairs by Edinburgh University Press. It charts how public policy has shifted away from the law to  allow people to ‘self identify’ as members of […]

On numbers and rights

Numbers of people who fall under different definitions of “trans” are variously expressed as percentages, ratios and absolute numbers – this can make them hard to compare. A small number In the debates leading up to the Gender Recognition Act in 2003 the government estimated that there were around 5,000 transsexual adults in the country […]

A good question and a clear answer

This week Shadow Secretary of State for Women and Equalities Marsha de Cordova asked a good question about the single sex exceptions in the Equality Act. Equalities Minister Kemi Badenoch gave a good and clear answer. Providers have the right to restrict the use of spaces on the basis of sex, and exclude transgender people […]